Calling All Vomit Experts

I need everyone to head on over to Liz's blog and help her out. There is a video of her daughter vomiting during eating. The docs are out of ideas. I know it's a lot to ask, but if you have ideas and reach out to Liz, please also post it here. My site meter always has hits from people searching for help for their vomiting preemies.

http://lizmccarthy.blogspot.com/2008/05/please-help-solve-our-vomit-issues.html#links

(I think the link will take you to the bottom of the comments. Please scroll all the way up to read her post).

Here is some additional information, from Liz, about her daughter.

Hi Stacy,

Thank you for your reaching out, after yet another day of pghelmy vomit, I
am about ready to throw my hands up and give up (yeah right, how can I give
up).

To answer your questions and more too, (as others have asked me too via
comments on my blog): (I think I'm going to put this in my blog too)

-No nissen, we've refused. The GI has been ok with us not doing one, as K
has gained weight on her own little nice chart (albeit with a LOT of work on
our part making up for the vomit). I truly believe this will not help her.
I know with a Nissen she would continue to gag and get phlegm - it will just
stop the vomit from coming up, but isn't going to solve the problem of the
phlegm

-Her left vocal chord is paralyzed

-She has her tonsils and adenoids (never been looked at), as I hate having
her scoped as she is already so oral averse. Does not have ear tubes.

- had 2 ear infections this year and 2 last year, minor ones.

-she is a very good pooper, never been constipated, EVER.

-She used to vomit up to 20x a day when gtube fed, she was fed 10hrs
straight at night without vomiting mostly.....she could only tolerate breast
milk, any formula and she vomited at night too (this was donated breast milk
so it wasn't "dairy free diet" breast milk. Because she never/rarely
vomited at night, I've always believed that she didn't have a milk issue.
It's when she's awake that causes more problems. As an infant she slept on
in include. NO longer, and was tube fed (BD) laying flat with no problem
whatsoever.

-We had tried all the hyper allergenic formulas at one time or another, and
no reduction in vomit.

-she recently (5 mo ago) tried a goats milk only diet (no cow dairy) for 2
weeks, with no difference in reduction of phlegm

-when was RAS allergy tested, no milk allergy shown

-never had any other signs of allergy (no blood in stool) no rashes (except
for some recent eczema on her feet and ankles)

-I just set an appointment to see an allergist (which is months away)

-it was when we switched to a BD (Blended diet) that her vomiting finally
got under control 2-3 times a day and we could much more rapidly give tube
feeds and we even were able to get rid of the night pump. We still gave her
last BD feed after she went asleep, but we finished by midnight, and she
never vomited. Her BD is milk/yogurt based, (again, remember at night we
could feed her BD asleep with no issues of vomiting and she was lying flat)

- Her vomits are now one of 3 types: - phlegm induced (she tries to clear
her throat and ends up emptying her stomach), gag induced (she's a horrible
chewer and often swallows food whole which results in a vomit) or
occasionally unannounced reflux type vomit (just comes all of a sudden, but
this is VERY rare).

-She's been on prevacid solutabs for almost her whole life (after zantac
didn't do anything, nor did prilosec), then again, we never saw any
difference with prevacid either (no reduction in vomit, I know, PPI don't
stop vomit, just reduce the acid)

-I took her off prevacid about 3 months ago, and felt strongly that her
phlegm seemed to decrease. I just started her back on it again, as I'm
afraid of the damage to her esophagus/teeth from the vomiting., but I happen
to strongly think that it's increased how much phlegm she is dealing with.

-we tried a few weeks on Periactin and went 3 days without vomit and hardly
any phlegm (first time EVER), then she got sick afterwards 3 times back to
back, so we haven't tried that again.

-she now eats 100% orally, only purees and doesn't "like" to eat, especially
when she has all that phlegm in her throat (for obvious reasons) Not a good
chewer, although she tries to chew meat, it takes forever, and for us to get
calories in we have blend her food

-her lungs are doing quite well all things considered, she doesn't have
asthma, has never had pneumonia since leaving the NICU (which typical
refluxers get a lot of pneumonia) (although has had some serious colds that
go into her lungs - one time bronchitis) and has had oral steroids a few
times.

-she never writhed/screamed with eating like you think of "typical"
refluxers, not signs of being uncomfortable except the refusal of eating.

-She was on reglan upon first coming home from NICU, no reduction in
vomiting, stopped years ago.

-we've tried Claritin for 3 days in a row with no reduction in phlegm/vomit.

Here are my ideas:
- She needs something to stop the production of phlegm. I think I'm going
to take her off prevacid again and see if we get a reduction in phlegm like
I think I did last time) as a trial. I'll put her on zantac to reduce the
acid damage to her esophagus.
-now that she's not sick any more I'll put her back on periactin
-contemplating trying Domperidone (which I know isn't legal in the US), but
my thought on Dom is that it is supposed to speed up processing time of
food, don't know if she needs this but I've heard form quite a few other
moms that it was a miracle worker for their vomiters.

OK, I just posted all the above on my blog too!

Thank you my dear!

Liz

Those Years Are Gone

Under my post "Guilt Revisited"

Future of Hope wrote:

"Anyways.... My guilt hits me full force whenever I look back at my son's early years. All of the time spent focused on this milestone or that, pushing and prodding for just "one more" skill, all the time spent running from PT to OT to SLP and back again. I would give literally anything to go back in time and get off of that merry-go-round. We lost so much. So much fun, so much "bonding", so much discovering and play. All in search of what was "supposed to be" instead of "what is". If he hadn't spent so much time pushed beyond his limits, would his social/emotional outlook be better? I missed so much that can't be gotten back - so many "firsts" that came so late that they brought with them more anxiety than joy. I was so wrong. I want my baby back. NOT my "preemie", not my "special needs child" but my BABY. the one that I had in my arms, and that I dreamed away."

Not one day has gone by since I first read her comment, that I haven't thought about the emotional impact of her words.

I have often thought back to the beginning years of Paige's life. We had various therapies 4 days a week, for her first 2 years. Physical therapy (twice a week), occupational therapy, speech therapy. 4 days a week of people coming out to our house to tell us all of the milestones she was not reaching and how to help her reach them. After 2 years, the time spent in therapy lessened to 3 days a week and we then saw the therapists at a pediatric therapy facility. It continued this way (some months increasing the amount of visits) for the first 5 years of her life.

Despite all of this therapy Paige still sat up late, crawled late, walked late, talked very late, has tone issues, fine motor issues and has severe sensory issues.

Looking back, do I feel that therapy was beneficial? No.

It was not beneficial for Paige but it was beneficial for me. I felt that I was doing everything to help her. How can we turn away services that are supposed to help our child? After giving birth to a preemie, is any parent in the right emotional state to ask questions as to the efficacy of therapy? I know I sure wasn't!

I have met a few parents who did not put their child through therapy. I fully expected to see a child who had not progressed as far as Paige but this is not the case. All of the children that I have met, who did not have therapy, are exactly where Paige is at... tone issues, fine motor issues and sensory issues.

I've always been upset about how much Paige (along with her Dad and I) had been put through for 5 years, only to be exactly where she (most likely) would have been without therapy. But, until reading the comment left by Future of Hope, I never realized how much I lost.

I'm writing this post so we all can openly discuss the early intervention services. I want new preemie parents, who are desperately searching the internet for information, to know that they have a choice regarding therapy. I don't want to sound as if I am criticizing those in the therapy fields, there is a place for them. But, what I really want to know is how others viewed their therapy time.

Eczema or Ring Worm?

I noticed this round rash on Paige's arm tonight. It looks like both eczema and ring worm. Does anyone have any experience with this? I don't want to put steroids on it if it's ring worm because it will make it worse. Since Paige skin picks (due to her OCD), I surely don't want to make it more noticeable to her. But, I don't want to assume it's eczema and have it be ring worm, which is very contagious. I hate to keep her home from school since there is so much end of the year fun stuff going on.

So, any thoughts? Anyone?

A Zoo Day

Nope, not this zoo.

A few weeks ago we headed to our local zoo. I have to admit... although we have a membership, I'm really not sure if I like the concept of a zoo. The idea of animals being kept in captivity bothers me. But, the idea of using the zoo as a teaching tool has me coming back. My husband and Paige will gladly tell you how I go on and on, the entire time we are there, about animal rights. Honestly, it's amazing what they will put up with in order to go see the animals. hehe

The first time we went to this zoo (when we had moved here-3 years ago), and I walked into this exhibit, I cried. It just doesn't seem right.

Now, 3 years later, watching Paige and Tyler with the Orangutan, I cried all over again. It still doesn't seem right.



Paige's favorite animal has always been the giraffe.

This zoo has quite a few peacocks. Paige loves to get up close with Daddy while he is taking pictures. Notice how far away I am. There is something that most people (unless you have been with me outdoors) do not know about me. I am TERRIFIED of birds. I know it's silly and I've tried telling my brain how ridiculous it is acting. But whenever I see a bird (or a duck, peacock, bat) that lovely fight or flight switch gets flipped to flight. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that I was attacked by ducks when I was little.

Hubby, however, has absolutely zero fear. Apparently the peacock doesn't have any fear either. He did not use the zoom for this shot.


This peacock speaks "Paige". She asked it to open its feathers and it did. She got a huge kick out of it.


Tyler, on the other hand, could have cared less. Yikes! We've been busted. He just turned 2 and he still has his pacifier. Any one have any tips on how to get rid of it that doesn't involve tears (from me or Tyler)?

We were able to take it away while he was on the zoo playground but he ended up putting the wood chips in his mouth. I vote for the pacifier instead.

From dragon slayer....

to princess. She has the wave down pat.

So, what happens when you have a husband who missed his calling and should have been a photographer? (At his real job he designs high end home theater systems for installers, which he loves)


After a day at the zoo you end up with a memory stick full of flower pictures. (below are only a few)





I'm not complaining though. He gets the coolest shots.


It was such a beautiful day. We all had a great time, especially Paige.

So, why is she running away?


It was time to go to the gift shop! Shopping trumps everything in Paige's world! hehe

**********May 19th update*********
Tyler fell tonight, face first on the kitchen floor. Below is a picture of his boo boo. You can see the outline of the pacifier on his face. I was hoping that he would refuse his pacifier because it would hurt to suck on it but... no such luck. Side note... his hair looks that way because I took a cool washcloth to his face in hopes of holding down the swelling. When I looked at the pictures on the computer, his hair looked greasy. I promise, my kids are clean. hehe

Head in Sand

Ahhh, it's comfortable in here. The sand is nice and cool and it's dark.

There's a world out there? Really? Well, I think I'll just stay in here for a while.

You see, in here Paige isn't doubled over in pain after she eats.

Last year the doctor told us that her gall bladder did not contain gallstones so the pain must be in her head. And, doctors are always right. At least they are while I am in my home in the sand.

If I come out of the sand I will have to fight. Again.

I will have to scream. IT'S NOT IN HER HEAD. IT ONLY HAPPENS AFTER SHE EATS GREASY, OILY FOOD. HER GALLBLADDER COULD BE SLUGGISH AND SHE DOESN'T DESERVE TO BE IN PAIN.

What happens if they do listen to me? What painful test will she need? Is it worse than the pain after she eats. I can keep on trying to be careful of what she eats. Can I do that for the rest of her life? What happens if one day the pain doesn't go away after 30 minutes? Will she need surgery? I don't want her to have to endure another surgery? Which is worse? Pain after eating or surgery?

Thank goodness I don't have to come out of this sand and face this issue.

Can someone tell me how to turn off that little voice that keeps on whispering, "It's time to fight again. Get your head out of the sand"

Happy Mother's Day

May all of you have the peaceful day that you deserve so very much.

Thank you for being a part of my journey as a mother.

Canadian IVF Study

Helen posted this under the comments of another recent blog entry. I moved it to its own post so the comments can be kept separate and so the information would be easy to find for people searching.


Helen Harrison here, reporting from beachside at Waikiki where I just attended the 2008 Society for Pediatric research:

Here was an excellent study of IVF that bears on the discussion at hand:

[4305.1] The Cost of Irresponsibility

Bridget Spelke, Annie Janvier, Richard Brown, Danielle Vallerand, Keith J. Barrington. Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Obstetrics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Multiple births increase the risks of fetal, maternal and neonatal morbidities. The present epidemic of multiple births is partly due to assisted reproductive technologies (ART). In contrast to Canada and the US, many countries regulate ARTs. In these countries, single embryo transfer (SET) during IVF is the norm. However, mothers with a history of infertility have increased perinatal morbidity even when a single embryo is transferred. In previous studies, 10% of women who have IVF and SET deliver before 35 weeks (and are therefore admitted to NICU).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of ART on resource utilization and outcomes in our NICU.

DESIGN/METHODS: We reviewed all multiple births admitted to the Royal Victoria Hospital NICU born between April 2005 and July 2007. Babies and mothers charts were reviewed. Using modeling and our patient demographics, we estimated how many days of complications could have been avoided if singletons were born to these mothers, had SET transfer been used during IVF.

RESULTS: During that period, 82 babies from ART multiple pregnancies were admitted to the NICU, representing 17% of NICU admissions.
4 mothers (9%) had previously experienced the death of a premature singleton.
42 mothers gave birth to 75 babies following IVF (15% of NICU admissions): average GA = 32.2wks, mortality 7%, intubation 34%, 60% TPN, 88% gavage, 6% BPD, 12% NEC / perforation.
If SET had been used in these women, and only10% would have delivered < 35 weeks, we could have avoided: 6 deaths, 5 severe IVHs, 270 eye exams, 4 surgeries for severe ROP, 260 intubated d, 643 oxygen d, 950 TPN d, 2001 gavage d, and 3082 NICU days.

CONCLUSIONS: Although some multiple births occur spontaneously, the current enormous increase in multiples is human-made, the lack of legal or voluntary restrictions on ART practices are responsible for 17% of NICU admissions, bringing about unacceptable financial and emotional costs. These admissions could be avoided. To reduce the number of multiple gestations, many countries have made SET the norm, and have drastically reduced the rate of multiples, while overall not affecting the pregnancy rate. We should take example from these countries.
E-PAS2008:634305.1

Sunday, May 4, 2008 9:15 AM

Platform Session: Clinical Bioethics (9:15 AM - 11:15 AM)
***

Guilt Revisited

In previous posts I have talked about the guilt that I had after Paige was born. Not only was it overwhelming but it was unproductive and killing me slowly. It was hard but I let go of it and was quite proud. I have often been found on others blogs telling them that they too need to be free of it.

Yesterday, while doing the dishes, I turned to check on Tyler. Since he is usually half in the dishwasher removing the dirty dishes that I've just placed there, I was surprised to see him sitting on the kitchen floor. He was playing with a ray of sunshine that was coming through the window over the sink. He'd "catch" it and then let it go. He spent time holding up jars of food (the cabinet was now empty) and holding them in the ray of light. He even figured out how to hold the jar so the light would bend. I was in awe. (he's going to be a rocket scientist ya know-hehe) There he was, playing by himself, with sunshine! It was a beautiful experience.

So, boy was I shocked when I was slapped with the guilt that followed.

As I sat there and watched my breathtakingly adorable child find wonder with a ray of sun I was thinking to myself, "wow, he is so much easier than Paige! So this is what it was supposed to be like."

How dare I compare my children! Paige has gone through so much. It's no wonder why she had a hard time as an infant and toddler (any beyond). How dare I feel comfort that Tyler is so much easier.

I was a mess yesterday. There it was again. That damn guilt. I thought I had left it behind years ago!

As I tried to fall asleep I felt sick. I had a headache, my back hurt, my stomach hurt. Damn guilt.

Then I forced myself to say good bye to it again. Let's hope it's gone for good.

The Purpose of My Blog...

Over the last several months my blog changed. As soon as there were discussions about limiting resuscitation based on gestational age, people became stuck. It didn't matter that we all have something in common. That one topic ruined the focus of the blog. People on each side of the argument held their position and carried it through to future discussions. I started to feel as though I couldn't talk about the difficult aspects of prematurity because people would just revert back to my feelings on comfort care. I also felt that I couldn't talk about the positives in Paige life because some people took my comments the wrong way. Although I feel that the topic of resuscitation is an important one, it is not the focus of my blog.

I originally started my blog because I felt that the publics perception (both the general public and those in the medical field) regarding the long term impacts of prematurity was so far off from reality that it was damaging.

For years preemie parents, upon discharge from the NICU, have been told that their baby will be fine and will catch up to their peers by age 2 or 3. For most, this is not the truth. Besides the research, and having a preemie of my own, I have been a part of support groups for 9 years and have listened to countless parents ask, "why hasn't my baby caught up?". They have real concerns that are not being addressed by doctors and their family members begin to think they are neurotic. Over time relationships suffer, marriages end and the child eventually gets diagnosed with something that validates the parents original concerns.

There is a disconnect between the perception of life as a preemie and the reality.

Why?

It is simple. How many preemie stories have you heard of, in the mainstream media, where the parents of an older preemie are explaining what life is really like for their child? I'd be willing to guess that you haven't heard many.

This needs to change.

False perception is damaging.

Below you will find a media release about an interesting survey, that fits in with the focus of my blog, taken (with permission) from http://prematurityprevention.org/.

For immediate release

Contacts:

Jennifer Montgomery, (502) 418-6819; Jennifer@m2-maximummedia.com

Ali Shaw, (502) 262-8580; ali@m2-maximummedia.com

APPROXIMATELY 62% OF PREGNANT WOMEN SURVEYED IN SELECTED AREAS OF KENTUCKY DO NOT VIEW PRETERM BIRTH AS A PROBLEM

Findings in Contrast to Growing Crisis of Preterm Birth

FRANKFORT, KY, APRIL 22, 2008 — A survey among pregnant women receiving prenatal care in Ashland, Lexington, Louisville, Madisonville, Paducah and Somerset finds that approximately 62 percent felt that preterm birth was not a serious problem or indicated that they weren’t sure. The finding stands in sharp contrast to the fact that preterm birth is the number one cause of newborn death, and a leading cause of serious, lifelong disabilities.

The survey was conducted by Healthy Babies Are Worth the Wait^R (HBWW), a three-year initiative and partnership of the March of Dimes, Johnson & Johnson Pediatric Institute, and the Kentucky Department for Public Health, aimed at reducing the rate of preterm birth in selected areas of Kentucky.

“We’re quite disconcerted by this finding, especially since preterm babies, even those born just a few weeks early, have more complications, such as problems with breathing, feeding, and their neurological systems,” said Ruth Ann Shepherd, M.D., FAAP, director, Adult & Child Health Improvement, Kentucky Department for Public Health.

This survey finding also stands in contrast to the results from a 2006 March of Dimes national survey in which only 11 percent of women felt that preterm birth was not a serious problem or were unsure.¹

The preterm birth rate in Kentucky is 14 percent, compared to the national rate of 12.7 percent. Between 1994 and 2004, the rate of infants born preterm in Kentucky increased more than 24 percent. Nationwide, the preterm birth rate has increased more than 30 percent since 1981.

In addition, 34 percent of women surveyed in these six selected areas of Kentucky smoked during the month before becoming pregnant, which is much more than the rate of smoking among childbearing-aged women in the US (20.6 percent).²

During pregnancy, approximately 22 percent of women surveyed in the six selected areas of Kentucky smoked, which is about twice the rate reported for the US as a whole.³ Pregnant smokers reported smoking anywhere from less than 1 cigarette per day to 2 packs per day. This represents a quit rate from preconception to pregnancy of about 35 percent, which is much lower than the average quit rate during pregnancy in the US of 46 percent.⁴ Less than 38 percent of the pregnant women reported that their health care provider had spoken to them about the importance of avoiding smoking during pregnancy. Smoking is a major risk factor for preterm birth, low birth weight, birth defects, and many other adverse health outcomes.

The purpose of the survey was to obtain up-to-date information on the knowledge, attitudes, and reported behaviors of pregnant women. The information will be used to: provide data about the needs of each of the communities to guide the HBWW Initiative, especially in the development of educational and media materials; and to help assess the impact of HBWW through a comparison of results before the initiative began and after it ends (the same survey will be repeated in 2009).

Healthy Babies Are Worth the Wait ^R is helping Kentucky’s babies get the best possible start in life. Working with health care providers and community partners, the initiative helps moms-to-be get the care and information they need to increase the chance of having healthy, full-term pregnancies. It brings together the most current approaches for preventing preterm birth, as no single intervention is adequate to address the complex causes of this serious problem.

The goal is to reduce the rate of preventable preterm birth by 15 percent in the intervention areas. If successful, the interventions and lessons learned could make a difference if applied to other regions of the country with high rates of preterm birth. The initiative’s website, prematurityprevention.org, has sections filled with up-to-date information for pregnant women, those planning to become pregnant, health care professionals, and the general public.

For more information about Healthy Babies Are Worth the Wait^R, log on to prematurityprevention.org.

About the March of Dimes

The March of Dimes is the leading nonprofit organization for pregnancy and baby health. With chapters nationwide and its premier event, March for Babies, the March of Dimes works to improve the health of babies by preventing birth defects, premature birth and infant mortality. For the latest resources and information, visit marchofdimes.com, marchofdimesbaby.org or nacersano.org.

About the Johnson & Johnson Pediatric Institute, L.L.C

The Johnson & Johnson Pediatric Institute, L.L.C. (JJPI) is an education-based entity within Johnson & Johnson Corporate Contributions, which has a mission to make life-changing, long-term differences in human health by targeting the world's major health-related issues. Johnson & Johnson fulfills this mission, and other philanthropic efforts, through community-based partnerships. Healthy Babies Are Worth the Wait is among programs Johnson & Johnson supports that focus on a key strategy of saving and improving the lives of women and children. For more information please visit www.jnj.com. Educational materials for use by physicians or parents are available at www.jjpi.com.

About the Kentucky Department for Public Health

The Department for Public Health (DPH) is a part of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services. Through its expansive services, DPH reaches thousands of Kentuckians each year by developing and operating all public health programs and activities for the citizens of Kentucky. These health service programs are aimed at prevention, detection, care and treatment of physical disabilities, illness and disease. More information about DPH can be found at chfs.ky.gov/dph.

-END-

1 March of Dimes. (2006). National Brand Study. White Plains, NY: Author. Childbearing age is defined as 18-44.

2 Peristats, March of Dimes. (2007). http://www.peristats.com

3 CDC. (2004). Smoking during pregnancy. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports, 53, 911-915.

4 Coleman, GJ & Joyce, T. (2003) Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy in ten states. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24, 29-35.

Happy Birthday Bug!!

Today my little guy turns 2 years old.

Even though we longed for more children, hubby and I could not bring ourselves to have another. We knew we could never forgive ourselves if another baby was born premature, like Paige.

But this pregnancy was a surprise. It was a long hard road too. I ended up carrying Tyler to 35.4 weeks.

He has been a gift, one that I treasure every day.

He makes us laugh every day!

His favorite person is the whole world... his sister!

I am not good at writing in this blog during times when I am very emotional. So, below you will find the journal entry from Tyler's private blog (written for family and friends). I wrote it on the day we brought him home.

We are ALL home. Wow that feels incredible to type!

Let's start with Monday, May 1st. I went in (at 8 am) for an amnio to determine lung maturity. After the test I was admitted to be monitored. I was 4cm at that time. I was having strange pains immediately following the amnio. I knew it had nothing to do with the amnio because it was no where near the site of the fluid draw. It did not feel like contractions either. But, I did know that something felt very wrong. The day was filled with us just sitting there, waiting for the results. Around 1:00 one of my OB's came to talk to us. 2 of the 3 markers for lung maturity were NOT there. She said that, if it was up to her, she would not do the c-section that day. But, it wasn't up to her and she told us that my regular doc (high risk OB) would be in soon to talk to us.

More waiting.

Around 3:30 my doc came in. That was the first time we had seen her that day. (she was actually on vacation but had planned on coming in to do my section) She was honest with us. She was really not sure what she wanted to do. On one hand she wanted to wait, due to the amnio results. On the other hand she was concerned that I would go into active labor and not know it (since I've not had any discomfort through any of the contractions that change my cervix). I explained to her that I was very sure something wasn't right because of that pain I was having.

She decided to check my cervix. I was now dilated past 5cm. Between the further dilation and the pain I was feeling, she was no longer on the fence. She told us that Tyler was going to be born very quickly.

On Monday May 1, 2006 Tyler was born at 4:38 pm. Then came the most beautiful moment of the past 35.4 weeks. Tyler announced to the world that he had arrived. He did so with the loudest cry we had ever heard. It echoed through the surgery room and back and forth through our ears like the most beautiful musical notes ever played. He weighed in at 6 lbs 10 3/4 oz and was 20.5" long. He did not immediately need any oxygen so Jason was able to hold him next to me for quite a long time.

Oh... that pain I was feeling... as my OB was finishing my surgery she leaned over the curtain that was separating us, to fill me in. Even with Tyler already out of my uterus, the spot where my first c-section (for Paige) was done, was paper thin. It was in that exact spot that I was feeling that pain. If I had not had Tyler that day, my uterus would have ruptured. How I was feeling that pain is still unknown. My uterus could have been bulging into an organ. Oddly enough... this whole pregnancy, my OB kept on saying that she would not let me go past 36 weeks because the risk of my uterus rupturing was too high (due to a previous classical c-section with Paige). She sure was right!

Tyler was then taken to the special care nursery. He was put on room air oxygen through a nasal canula. He never needed to be intubated nor did he need any surfactant, even though the amnio showed that he did not have the natural surfactant needed to breathe on his own.

By Tuesday 90% of the fluid in Tyler's lungs was cleared up. He was given a bottle by the end of the day and had no problems feeding at all!

On Wednesday night they stopped his IV fluids because he was eating so well.

On Thursday his billi count was getting a little high so he was put under the lights. He was doing so well that he was able to stay in our room all day Thursday.

On Friday his counts were back down and he was able to come out from under the lights.

Every day we were visited by the neonatologist, at least once a day. He was very respectful to Jason and I. He never talked down to us, knowing how much we had already learned over the years, and cited studies and research to back his feelings on Tyler's care. All along his only concern was that Tyler lost weight (his lowest was 6 lbs 2 oz) and was having trouble putting
some back on.

On Thursday night the nurse weighed him and he had gained an ounce. The neonatologist was thrilled.

On Friday he gave us the good news that we could take Tyler home-the same day that I was
released! Paige cried and said "I can't believe Tyler is a take home baby." We all cried.

The 40 minute drive home was beautiful. The sun was shining and it was warm and comforting. Paige and Tyler both took a nap in the car and it was a very peaceful ride home. Jason and I kept looking at each other, without speaking, feeling like we were in a dream that neither one of us wanted to wake from! We could *feel* how much each other realized how lucky we were to have 2 beautiful children.